About CR
Contact Us
Subscribe
Send Letter to Editor
HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | SUPPLEMENTS | CME | MAINTAINING CERTIFICATION | RESOURCES

Heart Failure/Hypertension


Issue: May 2008
Article Tools
Email This Article
Reprint This Article
Write the Editor

Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure in hypertensive patients

by Sidney Glasofer, MD • Peter M. Okin, MD

From the Greenberg Division of Cardiology,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Heart failure is well known to have a large economic and societal effect. It is an increasing public health problem, with a lifetime risk of 20% for both men and women.1 Current recommendations stress the need for prevention as well as halting the progression of heart failure.2 The methods for accomplishing this, however, need better elucidation. One well-known risk factor for heart failure is hypertension, with 39% of new cases in men and 59% in women ascribed to hypertension.1,3 Although antihypertensive therapy has been shown to decrease the risk of developing heart failure,4,5 it is unclear whether blood pressure control alone accounts for the degree of heart failure prevention associated with these therapies.

Independent of blood pressure, electrocardiographic (ECG) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is also associated with an increased risk of new heart failure.3,6-8 This risk is decreased by the prevention of ECG LVH.8 Antihypertensive therapy that reduced blood pressure has been shown to decrease ECG LVH, and regression of ECG LVH has been correlated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke, regardless of antihypertensive treatment or degree of decrease in blood pressure.9,10 Although this may suggest that LVH reduction is mechanistically important in preventing heart failure, it does not prove that reduction of ECG LVH with antihypertensive treatment prevents new-onset heart failure. Therefore, we investigated whether regression of ECG LVH using Cornell product criteria11 during antihypertensive treatment in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study12 was associated with a decrease in incident heart failure.

TIME-SAVER

Prior studies have shown an association between heart failure and the presence of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We investigated the relationship between regression of electrocardiographic (ECG) LVH by Cornell product with antihypertensive regimens and new-onset heart failure in subjects with hypertension and baseline LVH. There was a 36% lower rate of heart failure in subjects who had a reduction of ECG LVH by Cornell product that was greater than the median reduction (236 mm·msec), when controlled for antihypertensive therapy, in-treatment blood pressure, and baseline heart failure risk.

Subjects and methods

In this analysis, we used the data collected during the LIFE study,12 which was a double-blind, randomized trial designed to compare morbidity and mortality between losartan (Cozaar) and atenolol (Tenormin) antihypertensive therapy among 9,193 subjects with essential hypertension and ECG LVH (Cornell voltage-duration product11 or Sokolow-Lyon criteria13). From this population, 714 subjects were excluded because of either preexisting heart failure, heart failure within 6 months, or lack of a 6-month electrocardiogram. Antihypertensive treatment regimens were titrated upward throughout the study. Electro-cardiography was performed at baseline, at 6 months, and then annually. Left ventricular hypertrophy was identified by Cornell voltage-duration product (RaVL + SV3 with 6 mm added in women) > 2,440 mm·msec11 or Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5/6) > 38 mm.13 The secondary endpoint of hospitalization for heart failure was determined by diagnostic and clinical findings and was evaluated by the Endpoint Committee.


Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between the reduction of Cornell product and heart failure risk. Cornell product change from baseline and blood pressures were entered as time-varying covariates, and baseline risk factors as well as treatment group were regarded as standard covariates. We also analyzed the association between a reduction of Cornell product of 236 mm·msec or more (the median decrease between baseline and last in-study measurement), regarded as a dichotomous time-varying covariate, and heart failure risk. Kaplan-Meier graphs were generated by relating the development of heart failure over time to the presence or absence of reduction in the Cornell product by 236 mm·msec.

Results

New-onset heart failure developed in 214 subjects (2.5%) during the mean follow-up period of 4.7 years (standard deviation, 1.1). As shown in Table 1, subjects with hypertension who had new-onset heart failure were more likely to be African American, be current smokers, have diabetes, be more obese, and have a history of MI, ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular event, or atrial fibrillation. On laboratory analysis, subjects who developed heart failure had higher glucose and creatinine levels, greater albuminuria, and lower total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein levels. Of note, treatment with losartan- or atenolol-based therapy was similar between the 2 groups.


Table 2 shows the baseline and change from baseline to last in-study measurement of blood pressure and ECG LVH values according to the presence or absence of heart failure during follow-up. Compared with subjects without heart failure during the study, those who developed heart failure had similar baseline systolic blood pressure, lower baseline diastolic pressure, and greater severity of ECG LVH by Cornell product and Sokolow-Lyon voltage. Subjects who developed heart failure had greater reductions in systolic pressure, similar decreases in diastolic pressure, less regression of Sokolow-Lyon voltage LVH and, on average, progression of Cornell product LVH, compared with significant regression of Cornell product LVH in those who did not develop heart failure.

The endpoint of new-onset heart failure occurred in 214 subjects: in 137 subjects with an in-treatment decrease in Cornell product LVH < 236 mm·msec (6.8 per 1000 patient-years) and in 77 subjects with a ≥ 236 mm·msec decrease in Cornell product during treatment (4.4 per 1,000 patient-years). In univariate Cox analyses, a ≥ 236 mm·msec decrease in Cornell product was associated with a 43% lower risk of developing heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.76]. In the Figure, Kaplan-Meier curves show that a reduction of more than 236 mm·msec was associated with an absolute decrease in incidence of heart failure of 1% after 4 years. After adjusting for the possible effects of baseline differences in subject characteristics, differences in baseline ECG LVH, in-treatment blood pressure changes, and treatment regimen, a ≥ 236 mm·msec decrease in Cornell product remained associated with a 36% lower risk of new-onset heart failure (HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89). These analyses were also performed using change in Cornell product as a time-varying continuous variable.

Figure. Survival curves illustrating the rate of new-onset heart failure (HF) according to time-varying presence or absence of a reduction in Cornell voltage-duration product (CP) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) ³ 236 mm·msec from baseline to in-treatment electrocardiogram (ECG). Subject group assignment was adjusted at the time of each ECG based on the value of Cornell product at that time.14 The cumulative number of events and number of patients in each group at risk at study baseline and at annual follow-up are shown below the graph. (Reprinted with permission from Okin PM, Devereux RB, Harris KE, et al, for the LIFE Study Investigators. Reduction of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with decreased heart failure hospitalization in hypertensive patients. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147[5]:311-319.)

Discussion

Prior studies have shown ECG LVH at baseline to be a risk factor for heart failure.6,7 One study showed that baseline severity of Cornell product LVH is a risk factor for the development of heart failure in subjects with diabetes after controlling for other risk factors and treatment.7 Moreover, data from the LIFE study show that the ECG strain pattern of ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion in the lateral precordial leads is a predictor of heart failure.15 This strain pattern has been associated with increased left ventricular mass and depressed left ventricular function.16

The current study, however, was the first to study the association between ECG LVH regression and heart failure incidence. In this study, regression of ECG LVH with antihypertensive therapy was associated with a lower incidence of heart failure regardless of blood pressure lowering and other heart failure risk factors. There was a 36% lower rate of heart failure in subjects who had a reduction of ECG LVH by Cornell product that was greater than the median reduction (236 mm·msec). A decrease in the Cornell product was also a statistically significant indicator of decreased heart failure when treated as a continuous variable. We believe this was the first study to show this clear relationship.

The literature supports a correlation between left ventricular mass and features of systolic and diastolic dysfunction seen on an electrocar-diogram.17,18 As seen in the echocar-diographic substudy of the LIFE study, impaired endocardial and mid-wall shortening as well as prolonged isovolumetric relaxation time were associated with increased left ventricular mass.17,18 This may provide a mechanistic explanation for the results seen in the current study. Specifically, a reduction of Cornell product LVH may suggest an improvement in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, although this warrants further study.

A limitation of this study is that inclusion mandated ECG LVH; therefore, caution must be used prior to generalizing these results to all hypertensive subjects with less severe disease. Also, the endpoint for this study used hospitalization for heart failure to define new-onset heart failure. This most likely underestimated the incidence of new-onset heart failure, as not all episodes lead to hospitalization.

In conjunction with the increasing prevalence of heart failure in the US population1 and the known risk factor of preexisting LVH and hypertension for heart failure,17,18 this study provides support for the use of serial ECG measurements during antihypertensive therapy to monitor the risk of developing heart failure. Also, decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with less ECG LVH was previously seen in the LIFE study.10 The data in this study suggest that a possible goal of antihypertensive therapy should be reduction of ECG LVH as well as blood pressure lowering. This may further reduce the incidence of heart failure. Further study, however, is needed prior to issuing a recommendation to target LVH reduction beyond blood pressure goals with the use of antihypertensive therapy.

Conclusions

The findings of this study show the importance of monitoring ECG LVH in patients treated for hypertension with baseline LVH. A reduction of Cornell product LVH in these patients is associated with fewer hospitalizations for heart failure independent of blood pressure lowering and other heart failure risk factors.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported in part by grant COZ-368 and an Investigator-Initiated grant from Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania.

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Lifetime risk for developing congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002;106(24):3068-3072.
  2. Jessup M, Brozena S. Heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):2007-2018.
  3. Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, et al. The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1996;275(20): 1557-1562.
  4. Turnbull F, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362 (9395):1527-1535.
  5. Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD, et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2534-2544.
  6. Aronow WS, Ahn C. Association of elec-trocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy with the incidence of new congestive heart failure. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46(10):1280-1281.
  7. Carr AA, Kowey PR, Devereux RB, et al. Hospitalizations for new heart failure among subjects with diabetes mellitus in the RENAAL and LIFE studies. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(11):1530-1536.
  8. Mathew J, Sleight P, Lonn E, et al. Reduction of cardiovascular risk by regression of electrocardiographic markers of left ventricular hypertrophy by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril. Circulation. 2001;104(14):1615-1621.
  9. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Jern S, et al. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan versus atenolol: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. Circulation. 2003;108(6):684-690.
  10. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Jern S, et al. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihyperten-sive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2004; 292(19):2343-2349.
  11. Molloy TJ, Okin PM, Devereux RB, et al. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage-duration product. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(5):1180-1186.
  12. Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359(9311):995-1003.
  13. Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J. 1949;37(2):161-186.
  14. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Harris KE, et al. for the LIFE Study Investigators. Reduction of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with decreased heart failure hospitalization in hypertensive patients. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(5): 311-319.
  15. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Nieminen MS, et al. Electrocardiographic strain pattern and prediction of new-onset congestive heart failure in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113(1):67-73.
  16. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Nieminen MS, et al. Relationship of the electrocardiograph-ic strain pattern to left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients: the LIFE study. Losartan Intervention For End point. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):514-520.
  17. Wachtell K, Rokkedal J, Bella JN, et al. Effect of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy on left ventricular systolic function in systemic hypertension (The LIFE Study). Losartan Intervention For Endpoint. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(1):54-60.
  18. Wachtell K, Smith G, Gerdts E, et al. Left ventricular filling patterns in patients with systemic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (the LIFE study). Losartan Intervention For Endpoint. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(4):466-472.

A more detailed discussion of this topic can be found in Okin PM, Devereux RB, Harris KE, et al, for the LIFE Study Investigators. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with decreased heart failure hospitalization in hypertensive patients. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(5):311-319.



Related Articles - Heart Failure/Hypertension

Decreasing the risk of heart failure in a patient with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy - May 2008

Can reduction in electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy be helpful in preventing clinical heart failure? - May 2008

Displaying all 2 related articles.


Article Tools
Email This Article
Reprint This Article
Write the Editor
Search
   
Resources
Media Kit
Author Guidelines
Editorial Advisory Board
Reprints

Advertisement
Current Issue | Archives | Supplements | CME | Maintaining Certification | Resources
About CR | Contact Us | Subscribe | Send Letter to Editor
Media Kit | Author Guidelines | Editorial Advisory Board | Reprints
Other Healthcare Publications
The American Journal of Managed Care |  Cardiology Review |  Family Practice Recertification |  Internal Medicine World Report |  Pharmacy Times
Physician's Money Digest |  Resident & Staff |  Surgical Rounds